Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/04/22  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 2  ·  pp. 293–301
Predictive Modeling of Information Systems Success in Higher Education: A WarpPLS-SEM Analysis of User-Centered Portals
Coravil Joy C. Avila
This study evaluates the success of a university enrollment web portal through a predictive modeling approach that integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model (ISSM). Although higher education institutions increasingly deploy digital portals to support academic services, technical availability alone does not ensure user satisfaction, sustained use, or perceived institutional benefits. This study therefore examined the factors influencing user satisfaction, continuance intention, and net benefits in the context of the NEMSU enrollment portal. A mixed-methods design was employed, with quantitative data gathered from 176 students, faculty, and staff and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling through WarpPLS 8.0. Qualitative inputs were used to contextualize users’ experiences and support the interpretation of the quantitative findings. The results showed that system quality did not significantly influence user satisfaction, whereas information quality and service quality were strong predictors. User satisfaction significantly influenced continuance intention, while facilitating conditions and self-efficacy emerged as important drivers of sustained portal use. Mediation analysis further confirmed that continuance intention mediated the relationship between user satisfaction and net benefits. The findings suggest that university ICT administrators should prioritize accurate and timely enrollment information, responsive support services, reliable facilitating conditions, and user training to strengthen self-efficacy. The study contributes to the predictive validation of a hybrid UTAUT-ISSM model and provides practical guidance for improving sustainability, continuance adoption, and success of user-centered portals in higher education.
UTAUT ISSM User Satisfaction Continuance Intention Self-Efficacy Higher Education Enrollment Portal.
References
  1. E. Marandu, I. Mathew, T. Svotwa, R. Machera, and O. Jaiyeoba, “Predicting students’ intention to continue online learning post-COVID-19 pandemic: Extension of the unified theory of acceptance and usage technology,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 681-697, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-02-2022-0061.
  2. K. Vasuthevan, S. Vaithilingam, and J. Ng, “Academics’ continuance intention to use learning technologies during COVID-19 and beyond,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 1, art. no. e0295746, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295746.
  3. S. Nikou, “Web-based videoconferencing in online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: University students’ perspectives,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. (ICALT), 2021, pp. 431-435, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00137.
  4. Y. Li and M. Zhao, “A study on the influencing factors of continued intention to use MOOCs: UTAUT model and CCC moderating effect,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, art. no. 528259, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.528259.
  5. C. Gan, Y. Bong, G. Goh, and T. Liew, “Supporting student-centred learning with mobile technology: UTAUT and Hofstede’s dimensions of culture,” Cult. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 268-300, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/11356405251316068.
  6. S. Shirolkar and R. Kadam, “Determinants of adoption and usage of the online examination portal (OEP) in Indian universities,” Educ. + Training, vol. 65, no. 6/7, pp. 827-847, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2022-0360.
  7. M. Salim, L. Alfansi, A. Sularsih, F. Saputra, and C. Afandy, “The role of perceived usefulness in moderating the relationship between the DeLone and McLean model and user satisfaction,” Uncertain Supply Chain Manage., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 755-766, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.4.002.
  8. K. Çelik and A. Ayaz, “Validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model: A study on student information system,” Education and Information Technologies, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10798-4.
  9. P. E. Ramírez-Correa, F. J. Rondán-Cataluña, and J. Arenas-Gaitán, “Student information system satisfaction in higher education: The role of visual aesthetics,” Kybernetes, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1604-1622, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2017-0297.
  10. D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 102, pp. 67-86, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.
  11. M. Shams, M. Niazi, H. Gul, T. Mei, and K. Khan, “E-learning adoption in higher education institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multigroup analysis,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.783087.
  12. A. Shahzad, R. Hassan, A. Aremu, A. Hussain, and R. Lodhi, “Effects of COVID-19 in e-learning on higher education institution students: The group comparison between male and female,” Qual. Quant., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 805-826, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z.
  13. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9-30, 2003.
  14. W. A. Cidral, T. Oliveira, M. Di Felice, and M. Aparicio, “E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study,” Computers & Education, vol. 122, pp. 273-290, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001.
  15. B. Bervell, D. O. Mireku, and D. Agyapong, “Modelling the antecedents of students’ satisfaction and continuous use intentions of an electronic appraisal portal system in higher education,” Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 15, art. no. 100431, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100431.
  16. M. A. Almaiah, A. Al-Khasawneh, and A. Althunibat, “Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5261-5280, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y.
  17. B. Bervell et al., “Modelling distance education students’ satisfaction and continuous use intention of students’ portal: An importance-performance map analysis,” Inf. Dev., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 104-124, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231206774.
  18. A. AL-Hawamleh, “Exploring the satisfaction and continuance intention to use e-learning systems,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 201-214, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.15.2.8.
  19. D. Kala and D. Chaubey, “Cryptocurrency adoption and continuance intention among Indians: Moderating role of perceived government control,” Digit. Policy Regul. Gov., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 288-304, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2022-0108.
  20. S. Masrani, M. Amin, V. Sivakumaran, and S. Piaralal, “Important factors in measuring learners’ satisfaction and continuance intention in open and distance learning (ODL) institutions,” High. Educ. Ski. Work-Based Learn., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 587-608, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2022-0274.
  21. A. Siyal, H. Chen, G. Chen, M. Memon, and Z. Binte, “Structural equation modeling and artificial neural networks approach to predict continued use of mobile taxi booking apps: The mediating role of hedonic motivation,” Data Technol. Appl., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 372-399, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-03-2020-0066.
  22. K. Tang et al., “Predicting continuance intention and use of mobile shopping apps with PLS-SEM and necessary condition analysis in tandem,” J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.8(1)02.
  23. E. Tetteh, Z. Qin, and B. Kwofie, “Computer-mediated communication portal implementation framework: A higher education institutional perspective,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 180, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11641.
  24. M. I. Alkhawaja, M. S. Abd Halim, M. S. S. Abumandil, and A. S. Al-Adwan, “System quality and student’s acceptance of the e-learning system: The serial mediation of perceived usefulness and intention to use,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, art. no. ep350, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11525.
  25. S. Gautam and V. Singh, “Adaptive discretization using golden section to aid outlier detection for software development effort estimation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 90369-90387, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3200149.
  26. J. Karch, “Outliers may not be automatically removed,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 1735-1753, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001357.
ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Bringing together researchers, engineers and practitioners to share advances in applied information technology.
Submission deadline
September 29, 2026
Paper acceptance
November 2, 2026
Journal publication
November 30, 2026
Next conference
March 11, 2027 · Köthen, Germany
© 2026 ICAIIT · Anhalt University of Applied Sciences ISSN 2198-8005 (online)

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License