Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/04/22  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 2  ·  pp. 417–423
Application of Cloud-Based Digital Prototyping Systems for Developing Hardware Logic Skills
Andrii Lobatskyi, Pavlo Savaryn, Volodymyr Podolyak, Mykhailo Lepkiy and Vitalii Kabak
The abstraction gap between theoretical Boolean logic and physical circuit implementation remains a persistent pedagogical challenge in Computer Architecture education. This paper investigates a simulation-first workflow that uses Tinkercad Circuits as a cloud-based digital model environment for pre-physical verification of hardware logic designs. The proposed workflow follows a four-phase iterative process: logic design specification, virtual prototyping, virtual verification with integrated debugging tools, and physical breadboard implementation. A pilot implementation with 20 first-year computer engineering students showed promising descriptive outcomes: 18 students, or 90%, completed all assignments with correct functionality; average laboratory time decreased from 120 minutes to 80-90 minutes per assignment; and instructor assistance shifted from mechanical troubleshooting to conceptual analysis of logic behavior, timing, and design alternatives. Because the study involved a single cohort without a parallel control group, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence of feasibility and pedagogical potential rather than statistically conclusive proof of superiority over breadboard-first instruction.
Cloud-Based Prototyping Digital Model Digital-Twin-Inspired Workflow EDA Tools Computer Architecture Education Virtual Verification Hardware Logic Tinkercad Circuits.
References
  1. C. Qian, S. Chen, and A. Goodney, “Bridging simulation and hardware: A holistic platform for teaching in computer architecture and operating systems,” in Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (SIGCSE TS 2025), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2025, pp. 1591-1592, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3705135.
  2. C. Mirolo, C. Izu, V. Lonati, and E. Scapin, “Abstraction in Computer Science Education: An Overview,” Informatics in Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 615-639, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.27.
  3. K. DesPortes et al., “BitBlox: A redesign of the breadboard,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’16), Manchester, United Kingdom, 2016, pp. 203-212, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930708.
  4. M. Pajpach, R. Pribiš, P. Drahoš, E. Kučera, and O. Haffner, “Methodology and pilot implementation of modular educational-development platform for interoperable digital twin,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, art. no. 28020, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13579-y.
  5. J. S. Ortiz, E. K. Quishpe, G. X. Sailema, and N. S. Guamán, “Digital twin-based active learning for industrial process control and supervision in industry 4.0,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, art. no. 2076, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072076.
  6. M. A. Hazrat, N. M. S. Hassan, A. A. Chowdhury, M. G. Rasul, and B. A. Taylor, “Developing a skilled workforce for future industry demand: The potential of digital twin-based teaching and learning practices in engineering education,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 23, art. no. 16433, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316433.
  7. M. T. Taher and A. S. Khan, “Effectiveness of simulation versus hands-on labs: A case study for teaching an electronics course,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, 2015, art. no. 26.582, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23920.
  8. A. Kadir, “Effectiveness of virtual laboratory utilization in improving students’ science process skills,” Ta’dib, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 355-366, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v26i2.10913.
  9. Asbendri BL, S. Anori, I. P. Dewi, and Efrizon, “Exploring the impact of Tinkercad-assisted learning on student performance in industrial electronics subject,” Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning (J-HYTEL), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 134-148, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.v2i2.124.
  10. C. Tüysüz, N. C. Bodur, and I. Ugulu, “Tinkercad Circuits Platform-Based Learning Experiences of Gifted Students in the Emergency Distance Education Process,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 329-356, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241230589.
  11. O. Hulai, V. Shemet, I. Moroz, P. Savaryn, and V. Kabak, “Using the Labster virtual laboratory to study chemistry at a technical university,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 95-107, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v102i4.5737.
ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Bringing together researchers, engineers and practitioners to share advances in applied information technology.
Submission deadline
September 29, 2026
Paper acceptance
November 2, 2026
Journal publication
November 30, 2026
Next conference
March 11, 2027 · Köthen, Germany
© 2026 ICAIIT · Anhalt University of Applied Sciences ISSN 2198-8005 (online)

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License