The abstraction gap between theoretical Boolean logic and physical circuit implementation remains a persistent pedagogical challenge in Computer Architecture education. This paper investigates a simulation-first workflow that uses Tinkercad Circuits as a cloud-based digital model environment for pre-physical verification of hardware logic designs. The proposed workflow follows a four-phase iterative process: logic design specification, virtual prototyping, virtual verification with integrated debugging tools, and physical breadboard implementation. A pilot implementation with 20 first-year computer engineering students showed promising descriptive outcomes: 18 students, or 90%, completed all assignments with correct functionality; average laboratory time decreased from 120 minutes to 80-90 minutes per assignment; and instructor assistance shifted from mechanical troubleshooting to conceptual analysis of logic behavior, timing, and design alternatives. Because the study involved a single cohort without a parallel control group, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence of feasibility and pedagogical potential rather than statistically conclusive proof of superiority over breadboard-first instruction.
C. Qian, S. Chen, and A. Goodney, “Bridging simulation and hardware: A holistic platform for teaching in computer architecture and operating systems,” in Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (SIGCSE TS 2025), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2025, pp. 1591-1592, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3705135.
C. Mirolo, C. Izu, V. Lonati, and E. Scapin, “Abstraction in Computer Science Education: An Overview,” Informatics in Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 615-639, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.27.
K. DesPortes et al., “BitBlox: A redesign of the breadboard,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’16), Manchester, United Kingdom, 2016, pp. 203-212, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930708.
M. Pajpach, R. Pribiš, P. Drahoš, E. Kučera, and O. Haffner, “Methodology and pilot implementation of modular educational-development platform for interoperable digital twin,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, art. no. 28020, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13579-y.
J. S. Ortiz, E. K. Quishpe, G. X. Sailema, and N. S. Guamán, “Digital twin-based active learning for industrial process control and supervision in industry 4.0,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, art. no. 2076, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072076.
M. A. Hazrat, N. M. S. Hassan, A. A. Chowdhury, M. G. Rasul, and B. A. Taylor, “Developing a skilled workforce for future industry demand: The potential of digital twin-based teaching and learning practices in engineering education,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 23, art. no. 16433, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316433.
M. T. Taher and A. S. Khan, “Effectiveness of simulation versus hands-on labs: A case study for teaching an electronics course,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, 2015, art. no. 26.582, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23920.
A. Kadir, “Effectiveness of virtual laboratory utilization in improving students’ science process skills,” Ta’dib, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 355-366, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v26i2.10913.
Asbendri BL, S. Anori, I. P. Dewi, and Efrizon, “Exploring the impact of Tinkercad-assisted learning on student performance in industrial electronics subject,” Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning (J-HYTEL), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 134-148, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.v2i2.124.
C. Tüysüz, N. C. Bodur, and I. Ugulu, “Tinkercad Circuits Platform-Based Learning Experiences of Gifted Students in the Emergency Distance Education Process,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 329-356, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241230589.
O. Hulai, V. Shemet, I. Moroz, P. Savaryn, and V. Kabak, “Using the Labster virtual laboratory to study chemistry at a technical university,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 95-107, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v102i4.5737.