Young professionals aged 24 to 29 often struggle to juggle the different needs of their career and academic pursuits. This dual responsibility builds overlapping pressures that can affect their personal well-being, their academic achievement, and professional development. In this research, the authors utilized the SEM analysis to investigate the major drivers that affect this balance. An online survey questionnaire was employed to collect data among fifty participants on indicators such as balanced engagement, academic performance, career achievement, and psychological and emotional stressors. The result of the study emphasizes the importance of academic performance, professional advancement, and job contentment; moreover too, having structured routines, a good support system, well-being, and stress resilience are all very important. The findings of this study gave valuable insights to young professionals, employers, and educational institutions in creating an enabling environment for career growth and lifelong learning. The SEM findings further provide a basis for future studies aimed at enhancing support mechanisms for sustainable academic and professional growth that are aligned with broader global sustainability efforts.
Keywords
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) AnalysisCareer–Academic BalanceSustainable Development GoalsYoung Professionals.
References
M.R. Sallehuddin, A.H. Huzaidy, and N.A. Mohamad Rosli, “The Relationship between Stress, Workload, and Time Management towards Academic Performance among Working Postgraduates in Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM),” American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 45-55, 2019, ISSN: 2379-106X.
S. Endleman, H. Brittain, and T. Vaillancourt, “The Longitudinal Associations between Perfectionism and Academic Achievement across Adolescence,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 71, pp. 12-21, 2019.
O.S. Murad, “Social Anxiety in Relation to Self-Esteem among University Students in Jordan,” International Journal of Education and Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 45-54, 2018.
T.T. York, “Defining and Measuring Academic Success,” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1-20, 2015.
K. Bhui, S. Dinos, M. Galant-Miecznikowska, B. de Jongh, and S. Stansfeld, “Perceptions of Work Stress Causes and Effective Interventions in Employees Working in Public, Private, and Non-Governmental Organizations: A Qualitative Study,” BJ Psych Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 318-325, 2016.
United Nations, “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/70/1, 2015.
R. Molinero, A. Salguero, and S. Márquez, “Optimism and Resiliency among University Students,” European Journal of Education and Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 123-135, 2019.
V. Cyril, “Time Management and Academic Achievement of Higher Secondary Students,” International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 20-24, 2016.
J. de Winter, D. Dodou, and P. Wieringa, “Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 44, pp. 147-181, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206.
S.N. Goodman, “P Value, Hypothesis, and Likelihood: Implications for Epidemiology of a Neglected Historical Debate,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 137, pp. 485-496, 1993.
S. Ishak, “Career Success Studies: An Examination of Indicators, Approach and Underlying Theories in Literature,” Science Journal of Business and Management, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 251-257, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150306.16.
S. Endleman, H. Brittain, and T. Vaillancourt, “The Longitudinal Associations between Perfectionism and Academic Achievement across Adolescence,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 91-101, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254211037400.