The current situation in IP networks shows the need for new congestion control algorithms that can be flexible, scalable, and capable of avoiding additional queue delays caused by loading the bottleneck buffers. Most common internet flows use loss-based congestion controls, which can achieve high bottleneck bandwidth utilization and fair resource sharing but cause overload bottleneck buffers. In this paper we present an investigation of the performance of a PID-based congestion control solution for high-speed IP networks. It uses measurements of a round trip time and receiver delivery rate to reach and keep maximum available bottleneck performance and constant node buffer load caused by bottleneck queue on some low level. This algorithm can be effective in high-speed IP networks and delay-sensitive applications. It is designed to be flexible and scalable for different connectivity cases. This algorithm then is investigated on the example of RMDT.
E. Siemens, D. Syzov and D. Kachan, “High-speed UDP Data Transmission with Multithreading and Automatic Resource Allocation” Proc. of: the 4th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT, (ICAIIT 2016), pp. 51-56, Koethen, 2016
S. Maksymov, D. Kachan and E. Siemens, “Connection Establishment Algorithm for Multidestination Protocol” Proc. of: the 4th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT, (ICAIIT 2014), pp. 57-60, Koethen, 2016
Eduard Siemens, Ralf Einhorn, Andreas Aust, Lars Fuerst, "Multi-Gigabit Challenges: Similarities between Scientific Environments and Media Production" Proc. of: The IASTED International Conference on Automation, Control, and Information Technology (ACIT-ICT 2010), Novosibirsk, Russia.
A. Afanasyev, N. Tilley, P. Reiher, and L. Kleinrock, “Host-to-Host Congestion Control for TCP,” Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 304–342, Third 2010.
I. Rhee and L. Xu, “CUBIC: A New TCP-Friendly High-Speed TCP Variant,” Proc. of PFLDnet 2005, February 2005, Lyon, France.
L. S. Brakmo, S. W. O’Malley, and L. L. Peterson, “TCP Vegas: New Techniques for Congestion Detection and Avoidance,” in SIGCOMM ’94. Techniques for Congestion Detection and Avoidance,” in SIGCOMM ’94.
M. Hock, R. Bless, and M. Zitterbart, “Toward Coexistence of Different Congestion Control Mechanisms,” in 2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks, November 2016, pp. 567–570.
N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, C. S. Gunn, S. H. Yeganeh, and V. Jacobson, “BBR: Congestion-Based Congestion Control,” ACM Queue, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 50:20–50:53, Oct. 2016.
M. Hock, R. Bless and M. Zitterbart, “Experimental Evaluation of BBR Congestion Control,” in 2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Oct 2017.
FILA. Future Internet Lab Anhalt [Online]. Available from: https://fila-lab.de. 2017.11.12
Apposite. Apposite Technologies: Linktropy and Netropy Comparison. [Online]. Available from: http://www.apposite-tech.com/products/index.html. 2017.11.12