A spectrophotometric method for the determination of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) was developed using an azo coupling reaction combined with Cloud Point Extraction (CPE) in the presence of the nonionic surfactant Triton X-114. The previously developed azo coupling method demonstrated acceptable accuracy but suffered from limited sensitivity and interference from excipients that affected selectivity. In the present investigation, CPE was employed as a preconcentration step to overcome these limitations, allowing extraction of the colored azo product into the surfactant-rich phase. The method was optimized regarding the surfactant type and concentration, equilibrium temperature, and incubation time. The results showed significant improvement in sensitivity, precision, and accuracy, with a detection wavelength of 489 nm, recoveries around 101.8%, and low relative standard deviations. This technique was successfully applied to pharmaceutical preparations of SMZ without requiring additional complex steps, demonstrating superior sensitivity, selectivity, and environmental compatibility compared with the azo method alone. Thus, CPE provides a simple, cost-effective, and green analytical approach for the determination of sulfamethoxazole in both pure and pharmaceutical forms.
Keywords
SulfamethoxazoleCloud Point ExtractionTriton X-114SpectrophotometryPharmaceutical Analysis.
References
W. Fan, Y. Ma, Q. Li, Y. He, E. Zhao, J. Tang, and D. Yin, “Graph neural networks for social recommendation,” in Proc. World Wide Web Conf., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 417–426, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3308558.3313488.
D. P. Sangeetha, S. Sekar, P. R. Parvathy, T. R. GaneshBabu, and M. Muthulekshmi, “Optimizing shortest paths in big data using the Floyd-Warshall algorithm,” in Proc. 2025 Int. Conf. Intelligent Control, Computing and Communication (IC3), Mathura, India, pp. 382–387, 2025, doi: 10.1109/IC363308.2025.10957179.
D. Cullina and N. Kiyavash, “Improved achievability and converse bounds for Erdős-Rényi graph matching,” ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2964791.2901460.
T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations (ICLR), Toulon, France, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1609.02907.
Z. Wu, S. Pan, F. Chen, G. Long, C. Zhang, and P. S. Yu, “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386.
W. Jiang, H. Han, Y. Zhang, J. A. Wang, M. He, W. Gu, and X. Cheng, “Graph neural networks for routing optimization: Challenges and opportunities,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 21, Art. no. 9239, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16219239.
D. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Cui, S. X. Ng, R. G. Maunder, and L. Hanzo, “Deep-learning-aided packet routing in aeronautical ad hoc networks relying on real flight data: From single-objective to near-Pareto multiobjective optimization,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4598–4614, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3105357.
J. You, R. Ying, X. Ren, W. Hamilton, and J. Leskovec, “GraphRNN: Generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models,” in Proc. 35th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), Stockholm, Sweden, Jul. 2018, pp. 5708–5717, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.08773.
Y. Liu, P. Zhang, Y. Gao, C. Zhou, Z. Li, and H. Chen, “Combinatorial optimization with automated graph neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02872, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.02872.
D. Pugacheva, A. Ermakov, I. Lyskov, I. Makarov, and Y. Zotov, “Enhancing GNNs performance on combinatorial optimization by recurrent feature update,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16468, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.16468.
Z. Nezami, K. Zamanifar, K. Djemame, and E. Pournaras, “Decentralized edge-to-cloud load balancing: Service placement for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 64983–65000, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074962.
M. Fabris, “Distributed optimization strategies for mobile multi-agent systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 2019.
M. D. Tache, O. Păscuțoiu, and E. Borcoci, “Optimization algorithms in SDN: Routing, load balancing, and delay optimization,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 14, Art. no. 5967, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14145967.
M. L. Bertotti and G. Modanese, “The Bass diffusion model on finite Barabási-Albert networks,” Complexity, vol. 2019, Art. no. 6352657, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6352657.
M. L. Bertotti and G. Modanese, “The configuration model for Barabási-Albert networks,” Applied Network Science, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 32, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41109-019-0152-1.
E. Pang, E. Nijkamp, and Y. N. Wu, “Deep learning with TensorFlow: A review,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 227–248, 2020, doi: 10.3102/1076998619872761.
J. Moolayil and S. John, Learn Keras for Deep Neural Networks. Birmingham, U.K.: Apress, 2019.
A. Hagberg and D. Conway, NetworkX: Network Analysis with Python, ver. 2.x, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://networkx.github.io.