Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/03/31  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 1  ·  pp. 177–183
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Partial Differential Equations: A Comparative Study with the Burgers’ Equation
Hassan Al-Mahdawi, Ghassan Khazal Ali, Anna Ivanovna Sidikova and Hassan Hadi Saleh
Partial Differential Equations (PDE) are central to modelling phenomena of physical in engineering and science however up to now their mathematical solution has been elusive especially in high-dimensional domains with complex boundary conditions or nonlinear dynamics. Robust discretization techniques have been developed through the use of Finite Difference Method (FDM), Finite Element Method (FEM), and Spectral Methods but they face challenges of scalability, computational expense, and even problems associated with mesh-generation. Recently, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) were proposed as a mesh-free method by which the governing physical law constraints can be imposed while training deep neural networks to approximate solutions of PDE imposing their initial and boundary conditions. This study will use the one-dimensional PDE for the viscous Burgers’ equation as the baseline problem. First, a review of traditional approaches is presented with an explicit enumeration of their strengths and weaknesses. A PINN architecture is then designed that leverages automatic differentiation for the residuals and composite loss functions to enforce physics constraints. Mathematical analyses benchmark PINNs against FDM in terms of accuracy and demonstrate comparable levels of accuracy with less dependency on discretization as well as delivering a much smoother solution. The study recapitulates that though training effort is substantial for PINNs, it has an enticing possibility to crack nonlinear-PDE in higher dimensions and imbalanced geometries, therefore making an up-to-date leap forward from standard numerical analysis.
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Burgers’ Equation Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) Finite Difference Method (FDM) Finite Element Method (FEM) Spectral Methods.
References
  1. W. K. Liu, S. Li, and H. S. Park, “Eighty Years of the Finite Element Method: Birth, Evolution, and Future,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 5233-5262, 2022.
  2. O. Ogundairo, “A Comparative Study of Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods for Fractional Diffusion Equations,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 215-230, 2024.
  3. H. Almutairi and S. Saeed, “A Comparative Study of Finite Difference and Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Solving Boundary Value Problems,” Eurasian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 145-162, 2025.
  4. R. Meethal et al., “Finite Element Method-Enhanced Neural Network for Forward and Inverse Problems,” Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 1-21, 2023.
  5. T. G. Grossmann, D. Loukrezis, and T. Weiland, “Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks Beat the Finite Element Method?” IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 143-173, 2024.
  6. H. K. Al-Mahdawi and A. S. Alhumaima, “Particle Swarm Optimization Method for Parameter Selecting in Tikhonov Regularization Method for Solving Inverse Problems,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1715, p. 012032, 2020.
  7. H. K. Al-Mahdawi, “Solving an Inverse Boundary Value Problem for the Heat Conduction Equation by Lavrentiev Regularization Method,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2398, p. 060050, 2021.
  8. A. I. Sidikova and H. K. Al-Mahdawi, “The Solution of Inverse Boundary Problem for the Heat Exchange for the Hollow Cylinder,” Results in Applied Mathematics, vol. 20, p. 100330, 2024.
  9. J. H. Elsas, “An Introduction to Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations,” Medium Journal, 2024.
  10. A. Quarteroni, R. Sacco, and F. Saleri, Numerical Mathematics, 2nd ed., Springer, 2007.
  11. H. Chen, Y. Zhang, and M. Chen, “Deep-Learning-Enhanced Finite Element Method for Solving Nonlinear PDEs,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 417, p. 116418, 2024.
  12. T. Kossaczká, “Enhanced Finite Difference Methods by Deep Learning,” Advances in Computational Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 45-59, 2023.
  13. R. Raina, R. Badireddi, and S. Natesan, “Application of PINNs to Obtain Solution of Boundary Layer Problems Arising in Fluid Dynamics,” Mathematics Foundations of Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101-118, 2025.
  14. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear PDEs,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686-707, 2019.
  15. Z. Ren et al., “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Review of Theory, Algorithms, and Applications,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 8092, 2025.
  16. K. Luo, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for PDE Problems: A Survey,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 875-902, 2025.
  17. H. Wu, H. Luo, H. Wang, J. Wang, and M. Long, “Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometries,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, arXiv:2402.02366, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02366.
  18. J. Cho, J. Nam, J. Yang, S. Yun, S. Hong, and H. Park, “Separable PINN (SPINN) for High-Dimensional PDEs,” arXiv preprint, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15969.
  19. H. Wang, J. Sun, J. Bai, and M. Anitescu, “Kolmogorov–Arnold Informed Neural Networks (KINNs) for PDEs,” arXiv preprint, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11045.
  20. R. J. LeVeque, Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: Steady-State and Time-Dependent Problems, SIAM, 2007.
  21. C. Canuto, M. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, and T. A. Zang, Spectral Methods: Fundamentals in Single Domains, Springer, 2006.
  22. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice-Hall, 1996.
  23. O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, Elsevier, 2013.
  24. J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd ed., Dover Publications, 2001.
  25. G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, “Physics-Informed Machine Learning,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, pp. 422-440, 2021.
  26. S. Wang, H. Wang, and P. Perdikaris, “On the Eigenvector Bias of Fourier Feature Networks: From Regression to Solving Multi-Scale PDEs with PINNs,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 384, p. 113938, 2021.
  27. S. Wang, Y. Teng, and P. Perdikaris, “Understanding and Mitigating Gradient Pathologies in PINNs,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. A3055-A3081, 2021.
  28. Y. Lu et al., “Adaptive Sampling Strategies in PINNs for Multiscale Fluid Dynamics Problems,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 36, no. 3, 2024.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter