Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2025/12/22  ·  Vol. 13  ·  Issue 5  ·  pp. 841–851
IT-Driven Transformation of Global Trade and Its Impact on GDP in the Context of the 4IR
Oleksandr Vyshnevskyi and Nataliia Trushkina
📄 Download PDF DOI: 10.25673/123113
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of structural changes in exports and imports on GDP dynamics within the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), contrasting these effects with those observed during the Third Industrial Revolution. Using World Bank data for 1970-2021, the analysis shows that global trade peaked in 2008 at 61.43% of world GDP, followed by a gradual shift toward deglobalization driven by trade wars and import substitution policies. A comparative methodological approach is applied to examine GDP growth trajectories in relation to changes in the shares of exports and imports in GDP. The findings confirm that GDP growth rates are significantly influenced by both countries’ income levels and structural trade shifts. The study demonstrates that 4IR amplifies GDP growth when export expansion outpaces import growth, while also increasing the volatility of GDP responses to structural changes in trade flows. Income-specific patterns are identified: low- and lower-middle-income countries tend to benefit from export-led substitution strategies, whereas upper-middle- and high-income countries gain more from balanced trade expansion. Future research will focus on exploring the role of artificial intelligence in shaping global economic growth.
Keywords
Global Trade Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Export Import GDP Growth Import Substitution Structural Trade Shifts Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) Industry 4.0 Digital Transformation Digital Ecosystem Digital Innovation Digital Technologies.
References
  1. O. Vyshnevskyi, V. Liashenko, and O. Amosha, “The impact of Industry 4.0 and AI on economic growth,” Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser., vol. 9, pp. 391–400, 2019, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2019.140.32.
  2. O. Vyshnevskyi et al., “Economic growth in the conditions of digitalization in the EU countries,” Estud. Econ. Apl., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.25115/eea.v38i4.4041.
  3. A. Kuzior, O. Vyshnevskyi, and N. Trushkina, “Assessment of the impact of digitalization on greenhouse gas emissions on the example of EU member states,” Prod. Eng. Arch., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 407–419, 2022, doi: 10.30657/pea.2022.28.50.
  4. N. Trushkina, “The relationship between artificial intelligence and critical infrastructure development: Bibliometric analysis,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Applied Innovation in Information Technology (ICAIIT), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 231–241, 2025, doi: 10.25673/119238.
  5. World Bank, “Exports of goods and services (% of GDP), 1970–2021,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS.
  6. World Bank, “Imports of goods and services (% of GDP), 1970–2021,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.ZS.
  7. World Trade Organization, World Trade Statistical Review 2021. Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2021_e/wts2021_e.pdf.
  8. E. Brynjolfsson and B. Kahin, Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000.
  9. C. Dahlman, S. Mealy, and M. Wermelinger, “Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries,” OECD, Paris, France, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org.
  10. H. Dzwigol et al., “Manager competency assessment model in the conditions of Industry 4.0,” Entrepreneurship Sustain. Issues, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2630–2644, 2020, doi: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(5).
  11. T. Elmasry et al., “Digital Middle East: Transforming the region into a leading digital economy,” McKinsey & Company, New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com.
  12. A. Kwilinski, “Implementation of blockchain technology in accounting sphere,” Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J., vol. 23, no. SI2, pp. 1–6, 2019.
  13. A. Kwilinski, H. Dzwigol, and V. Dementyev, “Model of entrepreneurship financial activity of the transnational company based on intellectual technology,” Int. J. Entrep., vol. 24, pp. 1–5, 2020.
  14. F. Machlup, Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance, Vol. I: Knowledge and Knowledge Production. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2014.
  15. R. Miśkiewicz, “Challenges facing management practice in the light of Industry 4.0: The example of Poland,” Virtual Econ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 2019, doi: 10.34021/ve.2019.02.02(2).
  16. A. Tugui, “Meta-digital accounting in the context of cloud computing,” in Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 3rd ed., IGI Global, USA, 2015, pp. 20–32.
  17. M. Carlberg et al., “Industry 4.0,” European Parliament, 2016, doi: 10.2861/947880.
  18. K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2016.
  19. T. Philbeck and N. Davis, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution,” J. Int. Aff., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26588339.
  20. CompaniesMarketCap, “Largest companies by market cap,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://companiesmarketcap.com.
  21. L. W. Mihardjo, Sasmoko, F. Alamsyah, and Elidjena, “Boosting the firm transformation in Industry 5.0: Experience-agility innovation model,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 735–742, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.B1154.0982S919.
  22. S. Nahavandi, “Industry 5.0 – a human-centric solution,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 4371–4384, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11164371.
  23. L. Świątek, “From Industry 4.0 to Nature 4.0 – Sustainable infrastructure evolution by design,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 788, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 438–447, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94199-8_42.
  24. V. Roblek, M. Meško, and I. Podbregar, “Mapping of the emergence of Society 5.0: A bibliometric analysis,” Organizacija, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 293–305, 2021, doi: 10.2478/orga-2021-0020.
  25. A. Lewandowska, J. Berniak-Woźny, and N. Ahmad, “Competitiveness and innovation of SMEs under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges,” Equilibrium, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1045–1074, 2023, doi: 10.24136/eq.2023.033.
  26. L. Anantharaman and M. R. Sridharan, “Evolving an industrial digital ecosystem: A transformative case of the leather industry,” in Studies in Big Data, vol. 38, Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 247–272, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7515-5_18.
  27. E. Øvrelid and B. Bygstad, “The role of discourse in transforming digital infrastructures,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 221–242, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0268396219831994.
  28. B. Hinings et al., “Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective,” Inf. Organ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
  29. M. Burri and T. Cottier, Trade Governance in the Digital Age: World Trade Forum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139136716.002.
  30. C. M. T. Johnston and J. Buongiorno, “Impact of Brexit on the forest products industry,” Forestry, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2017, doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpw062.
  31. Y. Sun et al., “Global supply chains amplify economic costs of future extreme heat risk,” Nature, vol. 627, pp. 797–804, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07147-z.
  32. M. P. Abreu, S. A. Bevilacqua, and M. D. Pinho, “Import substitution and growth in Brazil, 1890s–1970s,” Texto para Discussão, no. 366, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://www.econstor.eu.
  33. A. R. Adewale, “Import substitution industrialisation and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS,” Future Bus. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–158, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.fbj.2017.06.001.
  34. J. A. Datas-Panero, “Import substitution,” Finance Dev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 34–39, 1971. [Online]. Available: https://www.elibrary.imf.org.
  35. D. Irwin, “Import substitution is making an unwelcome comeback,” Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.piie.com.
  36. D. Irwin, “The rise and fall of import substitution,” World Dev., vol. 139, Art. no. 105306, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105306.
  37. A. Mendes, M. Bertella, and R. Teixeira, “Industrialization in Sub-Saharan Africa and import substitution policy,” Braz. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 120–138, 2014, doi: 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100008.
  38. B. Sudarmawan, “The correlation of international trade and growth in Indonesia,” J. Econ. Dev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2022, doi: 10.14203/JEP.30.1.2022.31-46.
  39. C. Sapelli, “The political economics of import substitution industrialization,” Documentos de Trabajo, no. 257, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org.
  40. J. Okwori, “Import substitution strategy and industrial sector performance in Nigeria,” J. Econ. Policy Anal., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 47–62, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net.
  41. O. Gbenga and O. Oghenebrorhie, “Globalization and industrialization in Nigeria,” Soc. Manag. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12–24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net.
  42. World Bank, “GDP growth (annual %), 1970–2024,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Publisher Edition Hochschule Anhalt
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Email leiterin.hsb@hs-anhalt.de
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License
CC BY-SA 4.0

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter