Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2025/12/22  ·  Vol. 13  ·  Issue 5  ·  pp. 967–973
Financial Secrecy vs Anti-Money Laundering: Legal and Regulatory Dimensions in a Digitally Driven Global Environment
Olha Kovalchuk, Nataliia Holota, Iryna Svitlak, Serhiy Banakh and Viktor Ivchuk
This research examines the relationships between money laundering risks and financial secrecy levels across different global jurisdictions to formulate proposals for developing effective regulatory policies in the field of financial transparency. To achieve this objective, an interdisciplinary approach was employed, involving a comparative analysis of the Basel AML Index (AMLI) and the Financial Secrecy Index (FSI) for 109 jurisdictions. Visual spatial analysis and multidimensional correspondence analysis were performed using Statistica and RapidMiner statistical packages. A statistically significant relationship was identified between the studied indices (χ² = 16.73, p = 0.04). Three primary dimensions of interaction were distinguished, explaining 99.9% of the total system inertia. It was established that the categories “low FSI” (31%) and “very high AML” (30%) make the greatest contribution to overall variability. A latent inverse relationship was identified between the highest money laundering risks and the lowest level of financial secrecy, along with associative relationships between medium levels of AMLI and FSI. The unique positioning of jurisdictions with the highest financial transparency was established, which are not associated with any AML categories. It was concluded that the complex nonlinear structure of associations between the studied phenomena requires differentiated approaches to international legal regulation and public administration of financial transparency, taking into account the specific characteristics of national anti-money laundering regimes and legal systems. International organizations can utilize the obtained results to enhance financial risk assessment systems, by national regulators to tailor anti-money laundering legislation to jurisdictional specifics, and by financial institutions to develop more effective compliance control systems and reputational risk management strategies.
Security Economic Openness Anti-Money Laundering Corruption Financial Secrecy Public Policy Legal Regulation Government Regulation Global Dimension Interdisciplinary Approach.
References
  1. Zigram, “Money Laundering Statistics 2024,” Jan. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.zigram.tech/resources/money-laundering-statistics-2024/.
  2. W. Gaviyau and A. B. Sibindi, “Global Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Regulatory Framework: A Critique,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 16, no. 7, Art. no. 313, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16070313.
  3. A. AlQudah, M. Hailat, and D. Setabouha, “Money Laundering in Global Economies: How Economic Openness and Governance Affect Money Laundering in the EU, G20, BRICS, and CIVETS,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 18, no. 6, Art. no. 319, 2025, doi: 10.3390/jrfm18060319.
  4. A. Korauš, E. Jančíková, M. Gombár, L. Kurilovská, and F. Černák, “Ensuring Financial System Sustainability: Combating Hybrid Threats through Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Measures,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 17, no. 2, Art. no. 55, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jrfm17020055.
  5. FATF, “FATF, Egmont Group, INTERPOL and UNODC call for stronger co-operation between countries as they launch handbook to fight money laundering,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/international-cooperation-against-money-laundering.html.
  6. O. Kovalchuk, R. Shevchuk, and S. Banakh, “Cryptocurrency Crime Risks Modeling: Environment, E-Commerce, and Cybersecurity Issue,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 50673–50688, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386428.
  7. Chainalysis, “2025 Crypto Crime Trends: Illicit Volumes Portend Record Year as On-Chain Crime Becomes Increasingly Diverse and Professionalized,” Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-crypto-crime-report-introduction/.
  8. Tax Justice Network, “Financial Secrecy Index,” Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://fsi.taxjustice.net/full-list/#scoring_id=268.
  9. J. A. Sousa Torres et al., “Ontology Development for Asset Concealment Investigation: A Methodological Approach and Case Study in Asset Recovery,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, Art. no. 9654, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14219654.
  10. S. Sholli, “$492bn Lost in Tax Revenues to Havens Each Year: Report,” Nov. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.internationaltaxreview.com/article/2e1m41z3ozv57iu0hnsao/direct-tax/492bn-lost-in-tax-revenues-to-havens-each-year-report.
  11. FATF, “Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets/VASPs,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.fatf-gafi.org.
  12. FATF, “Complex Proliferation Financing and Sanctions Evasion Schemes,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/complex-proliferation-financing-sanctions.
  13. FATF, “Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering, Countering the Financing of Terrorism, and Counter-Proliferation Finance Deficiencies,” Jun. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/financial-action-task-force-identifies-jurisdictions-anti-money-laundering-3.
  14. FATF, “Outcomes FATF Plenary,” Jun. 26–28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/outcomes-fatf-plenary-june-2024.html.
  15. R. Barone, “D. Masciandaro. Green Grease: Environmental Crime, Corruption and Money Laundering,” Kyklos, vol. 78, pp. 991–1006, 2025, doi: 10.1111/kykl.12455.
  16. Basel Institute on Governance, “Basel AML Index 2024: 13th Public Edition Ranking money laundering risks around the world,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://index.baselgovernance.org/.
  17. K. Berezka and O. Kovalchuk, “Associative Rules for Modeling International Security Decisions in the Context of the Ukrainian-Russian War. Preliminary Evaluations,” Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 67–85, 2023.
  18. STHDA, “Principal Component Methods in R: Practical Guide,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sthda.com/english/articles/31-principal-component-methods-in-r-practical-guide/113-ca-correspondence-analysis-in-r-essentials/.
  19. StatSoft, Inc., “STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 10,” 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.statsoft.com.
  20. Altair, “RapidMiner,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://altair.com/altair-rapidminer.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter