Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2025/12/22  ·  Vol. 13  ·  Issue 5  ·  pp. 57 –68
Digital Reconstruction of Architectural Heritage through Virtual Reality: The Samarkand Aksaray Monument Case Study
Nilufar Tukhboeva, Sanjar Anvarov, Saidislom Mannonov, Takhir Mamatmusaev, Shukhrat Reyimbaev and Maktuba Abdujabbarova
The use of digital technologies for the digitisation and virtual reconstruction of architectural heritage has gained global relevance. This paper presents the initial stage of a scientific and practical study aimed at digitally reconstructing the 15th century Aksaray Palace in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, and creating a virtual tour using virtual reality (VR) tools. The research analyses the preliminary results obtained in the field of cultural heritage. Taking a multidisciplinary approach, the project uses 3D scanning and VR technologies to propose innovative and sustainable methods of preserving architectural heritage by digitising the monument and developing a reconstruction concept. The project's primary objective is to disseminate knowledge about the palace to a wider audience, integrating interdisciplinary perspectives from architecture, art, information technology, history and archaeology. The project was implemented in several stages. First, laser scanning was conducted to collect measurements, which were then processed to create a 3D model and virtual representation of Aksaray, reflecting its current state as well as the original decorative features of its interior. Based on historical, archival, and geometric analyses of ornaments, decorations, colours, and compositions, a step-by-step reconstruction model was prepared simultaneously.
Digitization Cultural Heritage Virtual Reality 3D Scanning Architectural Composition Aksaray.
References
  1. I. E. Sutherland, “The ultimate display,” in Proc. IFIP Congress, vol. 2, pp. 506–508, 1965.
  2. J. Steuer, “Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence,” Journal of Communication, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 73–93, 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x.
  3. G. Burdea and P. Coiffet, Virtual Reality Technology, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2003.
  4. T. A. Mikropoulos and A. Natsis, “Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009),” Computers & Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 769–780, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020.
  5. W. R. Sherman and A. B. Craig, Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2019.
  6. M. Slater and M. V. Sanchez-Vives, “Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 3, Art. no. 74, 2016, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00074.
  7. K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York, NY, USA: Crown Business, 2017.
  8. S. Gill et al., “Industry 4.0 and heritage conservation: Opportunities and challenges,” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–130, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-01-2019-0001.
  9. UNESCO, Policy Document for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2015.
  10. O. Grabar, The Mediation of Ornament. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1992.
  11. G. A. Pugachenkova, Architecture of Central Asia in the 15th Century. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 1976.
  12. S. Blair, Islamic Inscriptions. Edinburgh, U.K.: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
  13. L. Golombek and D. Wilber, Timurid Architecture of Iran and Turan. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1988.
  14. D. Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country – Revisited. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  15. G. Guidi, M. Russo, and D. Angheleddu, “3D survey and virtual reconstruction of archaeological sites,” Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 55–69, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.daach.2014.01.001.
  16. A. U. Peker, “The monumental iwan: Symbolism and architectural continuity,” METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, vol. 11, no. 1–2, pp. 47–72, 1991, doi: 10.4305/METU.JFA.1991.11.1-2.3.
  17. N. Tukhboeva, “Digital heritage and virtual reconstruction of Central Asian monuments,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Applied Innovations in IT (ICAIIT), Köthen, Germany, Mar. 2023, pp. 179–183.
  18. E. Champion, Critical Gaming: Interactive History and Virtual Heritage. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.
  19. S. Pescarin, “Digital heritage and the dissemination of 3D models,” Virtual Archaeology Review, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1–10, 2014, doi: 10.4995/var.2014.4191.
  20. A. C. Addison, “Emerging trends in virtual heritage,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 22–25, 2000, doi: 10.1109/93.848421.
  21. M. Forte, “Cyber-archaeology: Notes on the simulation of the past,” Virtual Archaeology Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 7–18, 2010, doi: 10.4995/var.2010.4550.
  22. F. Remondino and S. Campana, 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: Theory and Best Practices. Oxford, U.K.: Archaeopress, 2014.
  23. V. V. Bartold, Works, vol. II. Moscow, Russia: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1963.
  24. A. L. Kun, Turkestan Album. St. Petersburg, Russia, 1871–1872.
  25. M. E. Masson, Archaeological Research in Samarkand and Shahrisabz. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1924.
  26. G. A. Pugachenkova, Architecture of the Timurid Era. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1976.
  27. G. V. Shishkin, Architectural Monuments of Shahrisabz. Samarkand, Uzbekistan, 1936.
  28. A. S. Mirzaakhmedov, “On the question of the construction techniques of the Aksaray,” Proc. Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, no. 2, 1953.
  29. N. Kh. Arslanova, Symbolism of Timurid Architecture. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1982.
  30. S. Blair and J. Bloom, The Art and Architecture of Islam 1250–1800. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 1994.
  31. L. Golombek and D. Wilber, The Architecture of the Timurids in Iran and Turan. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1988.
  32. O. Grabar, The Mediation of Ornament. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1992.
  33. G. Necipoğlu, The Topkapi Scroll: Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Santa Monica, CA, USA: Getty Center, 1995.
  34. V. L. Vyatkin, Shahrisabz and Its Monuments. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1946.
  35. V. I. Syrkin, Documentation of Architectural Monuments of Samarkand and Shahrisabz. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Institute of Archaeology, Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, 1948.
  36. V. V. Bartold, Works, vol. II. Moscow, Russia: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1963.
  37. V. A. Zhukovsky, Archaeological Notes on Central Asia. Warsaw, Poland, 1897.
  38. M. E. Masson, Archaeological Research in Samarkand and Shahrisabz. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1930.
  39. A. A. Semyonov, Epigraphic Materials on the Architectural Monuments of Shahrisabz. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1932.
  40. B. N. Zasypkin, Materials on the History of Architecture of Central Asia. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1936.
  41. M. F. Muradov, Technical Condition and Restoration of the Monuments of Shahrisabz. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1955.
  42. G. A. Pugachenkova, Architectural Monuments of Central Asia from the Navoi Era. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1957.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter