Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2022/03/09  ·  Vol. 10  ·  Issue 1  ·  pp. 51–59
Robotic System Operation Specification on the Example of Object Manipulation
Leonid Mylnikov, Pavel Slivnitsin and Anna Mylnikova
📄 Download PDF DOI: 10.25673/76932
Abstract
Currently, robotic system tasks are formalized with help of procedural programming languages that do not take into account the specificity of robots and are not generic in their application. The goal of the paper is to develop a method of semantic description of the sequence of operations performed by a robotic system on the example of object manipulation around them. To achieve the goal, a method of a graphical representation of a robotic system operation specification and its semantic description (metalanguage) are proposed. The paper considers the approaches to the objects’ representation, determines the way object characteristics are stored, and provides the list of possible operations with objects. The obtained methods of graphical and semantic robotic system operation specification allow to assign the task without being bound to a specific technical solution. In addition, the paper provides the examples of operation assignments for the robotic arm.
Keywords
Function Modeling Diagram Metalanguage Recognition Identification Positioning SLAM Computer Vision Robotic System.Function Modeling Diagram Metalanguage Recognition Identification Positioning SLAM Computer Vision Robotic System
References
  1. Fanuc Europe,“Robot industrial applications.” [Online]. Available: https://www.fanuc.eu/de/en/industrial-applications. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2021].
  2. A. Delfanti and B. Frey, “Humanly ExtendedAutomation or the Future of Work Seenthrough Amazon Patents,” Sci. Technol.Hum. Values, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 655–682,2021.
  3. P. Slivnitsin, A. Bachurin, and L. Mylnikov,“Robotic system position control algorithmbased on target object recognition,” inProceedings of International Conference onApplied Innovation in IT, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1,pp. 87–94.
  4. A. Zeng et al., “Multi-view self-superviseddeep learning for 6D pose estimation in theAmazon Picking Challenge,” Proc. - IEEEInt. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 1386–1393,2017.
  5. A. Zeng, S. Song, J. Lee, A. Rodriguez, andT.Funkhouser, “TossingBot: Learning toThrow Arbitrary Objects with ResidualPhysics,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 36, no. 4,pp. 1307–1319, 2020.
  6. A. Novikova, “Direct Machine Translationand Formalization Issues of LanguageStructures and Their Matches by AutomatedMachine Translation for the Russian-EnglishLanguage Pair,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT, 2018, pp. 85–92.
  7. P. Thompson, “Margaret Thatcher: A NewIllusion,” Perception, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 483–484, Aug. 1980.
  8. R. M. Nosofsky, “The generalized contextmodel: an exemplar model of classification,”Form. Approaches Categ., pp. 18–39, 2012.
  9. E. Rosch, “Cognitive representations ofsemantic categories.,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.,vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 192–233, Sep. 1975.
  10. P. G. Neumann, “Visual prototype formationwith discontinuous representation ofdimensions of variability,” Mem. Cognit.,vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 187–197, Mar. 1977.
  11. D. G. Lowe, “Object Recognition from LocalScale-Invariant Features,” in Proceedings ofthe Seventh IEEE International Conferenceon Computer Vision, 1999, p. 8.
  12. H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool,“SURF: Speeded up robust features,” Lect.Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect.Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. NotesBioinformatics), vol. 3951 LNCS, no. July2006, pp. 404–417, 2006.
  13. F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 386–408, 1958.
  14. O. G. Selfridge, “Pandemonium: a paradigmfor learning,” in Proceedings on theSymposium on Mechanisation of ThoughtProcesse, 1959, pp. 511–529.
  15. N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms oforiented gradients for human detection,”Proc. - 2005 IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf.Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition, CVPR2005, vol. I, no. 16, pp. 886–893, 2005.
  16. P. Viola and M. Jones, “Rapid ObjectDetection using a Boosted Cascade of SimpleFeatures,” in Proceedings IEEE Conf. onComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition,2001, pp. 511–518.
  17. Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, andP.Haffner, “Gradient-based learning appliedto document recognition,” Proc. IEEE, vol.86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998.
  18. H. Lee, R. Grosse, R. Ranganath, andA. Y. Ng, “Unsupervised learning ofhierarchical representations with convolutional deep belief networks,” Commun. ACM, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 95–103, 2011.
  19. A. E. Kononyuk, Obshchaya teoriyaraspoznavaniya. Matematicheskiye sredstvaopisaniya raspoznavayemykh obyektov iraspoznayushchikh protsessov. Kiyev. 2012.
  20. P. J. Diggle and J. Serra, “Image Analysis andMathematical Morphology.,” Biometrics,vol. 39, no. 2, p. 536, Jun. 1983.
  21. Y. V. Vizilter, Y. P. Pyt’ev, A. I. Chulichkov,and L. M. Mestetskiy, “Morphological ImageAnalysis for Computer Vision Applications,”2015, pp. 9–58.
  22. D. Marr and T. Poggio, “A computationaltheory of human stereo vision,” Proc. R. Soc.London - Biol. Sci., vol. 204, no. 1156, pp.301–328, 1979.
  23. D. Marr and H. K. Nishihara,“Representation and recognition of the spatialorganization of three-dimensional shapes,”Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B. Biol. Sci., vol.200, no. 1140, pp. 269–294, Feb. 1978.
  24. D. Marr and L. Vaina, “Representation andrecognition of the movements of shapes,”Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B. Biol. Sci., vol.214, no. 1197, pp. 501–524, Mar. 1982.
  25. I. Biederman, “Recognition-by-Components:A Theory of Human Image Understanding,”Psychol. Rev., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 115–147,1987.
  26. I. Biederman, “Matching Image Edges ToObject Memory.” pp. 384–392, 1987.
  27. S. Jin et al., “Whole-Body Human PoseEstimation in the Wild,” Lect. Notes Comput.Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif.Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol.12354 LNCS, pp. 196–214, Jul. 2020.
  28. T. Simon, H. Joo, I. Matthews, and Y. Sheikh,“Hand keypoint detection in single imagesusing multiview bootstrapping,” Proc. - 30thIEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. PatternRecognition, CVPR 2017, vol. 2017-Janua,pp. 4645–4653, 2017.
  29. L. Jiao et al., “A survey of deep learning-based object detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 7,no. 3, pp. 128837–128868, 2019.
  30. L. A. Mylnikov, Statisticheskiye metody intellekttsualnogo analiza dannykh. SPb.:BKhV-Peterburg. 2021.
  31. D. Lemire and A. Maclachlan, “Slope One Predictors for Online Rating-Based Collaborative Filtering,” SIAM DataMin. (SDM’05), Newport Beach, California,April 21-23, 2005.
  32. D. Vershinin and L. Mylnikov, “A review andcomparison of mapping and trajectoryselection algorithms,” Proc. Int. Conf. Appl.Innov. IT, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2021.
  33. G. F. Luger, Artificial Intelligence:Structures and Strategies for ComplexProblem Solving, vol. 5th. 2005.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Publisher Edition Hochschule Anhalt
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Email leiterin.hsb@hs-anhalt.de
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License
CC BY-SA 4.0

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter